Sun. May 26th, 2024

17 states sue over rule entitling workers to some abortion accommodations

Tyler Mitchell By Tyler Mitchell May22,2024

Republican attorneys general from 17 states have filed a lawsuit challenging a rule entitling workers to some abortion accommodations, alleging the regulation adopted by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is in overreach. 

The lawsuit led by Tennessee and Arkansas was filed in federal district court in eastern Arkansas on Thursday. It alleges that EEOC’s rule, which implemented the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA), is in violation of the law. 

The rule, implemented in mid-April, requires those covered under it to be given “reasonable accommodations” when it comes to childbirth, pregnancy and other conditions. It had bipartisan support when it passed in Congress. 

“An unelected body like the EEOC Commission does not have the authority to rewrite laws passed by Congress,” Alabama’s Attorney General Steve Marshall said in a statement. “Congress sought to ensure accommodations on the job to promote the health of pregnant women and their babies.”  

“[President] Biden’s EEOC has illegally transformed that bipartisan law into a mandate that employers facilitate abortions. Biden is again violating the law to promote his radical agenda, and we will again stop him.”

The final regulations were adopted by the EEOC on April 19 in a 3-2 vote.

The states are arguing the EEOC “seeks to hijack these new protections for pregnancies by requiring employers to accommodate workers’ abortions — something Congress did not authorize.” 

They also alleged that their states would face “various” costs, “including those associated with lost productivity, shift covering, and provision of additional leave days, among others.” 

Compliance and human resources costs would be another financial hit for the states, according to the lawsuit. 

In addition to Tennessee, Arkansas and Alabama, the other states joining the lawsuit were Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah and West Virginia.

Tyler Mitchell

By Tyler Mitchell

Tyler is a renowned journalist with years of experience covering a wide range of topics including politics, entertainment, and technology. His insightful analysis and compelling storytelling have made him a trusted source for breaking news and expert commentary.

Related Post

2 thoughts on “17 states sue over rule entitling workers to some abortion accommodations”
  1. As a pro-choice advocate, I believe that the EEOC’s rule is essential in ensuring that pregnant workers are provided with necessary accommodations. It’s disappointing to see these states attempting to undermine the rights of pregnant individuals by challenging this regulation in court. Women should have the right to make their own medical decisions without facing discrimination in the workplace.

  2. In my opinion, it is crucial to uphold the laws passed by Congress rather than allowing unelected bodies to overstep their boundaries. The rule implemented by the EEOC should focus on providing reasonable accommodations for pregnant workers without expanding it to include facilitation of abortions. It’s important to prioritize the health and well-being of pregnant women and their babies while respecting the intent of the bipartisan law.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *